But as a leading automobile magazine, don't you lose credibility with articles like this??? Again, if the writer had presented this article with his fact-based theory or built an argument to why he believes XYZ, then we as the reader take it as that...his opinion. We then decide if its a compelling article and either agree or disagree. I understand the need for click-bait certainly, (I assume the point of the pic) but when I read a car magazine I like to know that I'm easily able distinguish between fact vs professional opinion, even when its a car I have 0 interest in.
P.S rant over. I'll another article that does the same thing tomorrow..lol
Check out my Bronco Logic YouTube Channel!
1996 Wht Sport MAF/OBD II 466
1996 Wht KR 351-4" & 33's 1996 Blue EB 351-32's 1996 Wht/Tan 351-Stock 1995 Blk XLT 351 1994 Blk EB 302-Stock SOLD 30 others....